<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ayn Rand on Sex, Love and Relationships</title>
	<atom:link href="http://lifewithsoul.com/2008/12/ayn-rand-on-sex-love-and-relationships/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://lifewithsoul.com/2008/12/ayn-rand-on-sex-love-and-relationships/</link>
	<description>Dating &#38; Relationships Advice for Men</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2010 04:38:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://lifewithsoul.com/2008/12/ayn-rand-on-sex-love-and-relationships/comment-page-1/#comment-6634</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 02:25:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lifewithsoul.com/?p=153#comment-6634</guid>
		<description>Fede i think you&#039;re misunderstanding.

having sex with someone you are attracted to should be based on self esteem... not on whim alone

Ayn didnt believe in promiscuity</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fede i think you&#8217;re misunderstanding.</p>
<p>having sex with someone you are attracted to should be based on self esteem&#8230; not on whim alone</p>
<p>Ayn didnt believe in promiscuity</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Soul</title>
		<link>http://lifewithsoul.com/2008/12/ayn-rand-on-sex-love-and-relationships/comment-page-1/#comment-4870</link>
		<dc:creator>Soul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2009 02:43:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lifewithsoul.com/?p=153#comment-4870</guid>
		<description>They are not my words man, but quoted from Ayn Rand. I would have suggested raising your criticism with her, alas she is now buried within the grounds of the Earth.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They are not my words man, but quoted from Ayn Rand. I would have suggested raising your criticism with her, alas she is now buried within the grounds of the Earth.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shameless</title>
		<link>http://lifewithsoul.com/2008/12/ayn-rand-on-sex-love-and-relationships/comment-page-1/#comment-4742</link>
		<dc:creator>Shameless</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 22:33:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lifewithsoul.com/?p=153#comment-4742</guid>
		<description>Interesting post yet I find it quite contradictory.

I really liked the first part in which you explain why a woman never should feel a slut only because she slept with a man she felt attracted to. I think that women have a right to enjoy sex as men, break out of the current social conditioning and - if they want to - have the same right to sleep around as guys have. In that sense I found the viewpoints in your post quite modern. 


But then, in the last article it looks as if you completely fall back into old &quot;machist&quot; thoughrpatterns when you state that the highest-quality woman are the hardest to conquer and always give more satisfaction than a &quot;brainless slut&quot;. Isnt this just the old social conditioning, where difficult to conquer = high quality girl and fast to conquer = slut? Yes, I agree that we should strive for a high-quality, interesting girl with whom you can share a conversation and interesting experiences but this is absolutely not related to whether she will have sex with me sooner or later...

Love your posts, always interesting and inspiring even though I might disagree... ;)

Cheers,
Fede</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting post yet I find it quite contradictory.</p>
<p>I really liked the first part in which you explain why a woman never should feel a slut only because she slept with a man she felt attracted to. I think that women have a right to enjoy sex as men, break out of the current social conditioning and &#8211; if they want to &#8211; have the same right to sleep around as guys have. In that sense I found the viewpoints in your post quite modern. </p>
<p>But then, in the last article it looks as if you completely fall back into old &#8220;machist&#8221; thoughrpatterns when you state that the highest-quality woman are the hardest to conquer and always give more satisfaction than a &#8220;brainless slut&#8221;. Isnt this just the old social conditioning, where difficult to conquer = high quality girl and fast to conquer = slut? Yes, I agree that we should strive for a high-quality, interesting girl with whom you can share a conversation and interesting experiences but this is absolutely not related to whether she will have sex with me sooner or later&#8230;</p>
<p>Love your posts, always interesting and inspiring even though I might disagree&#8230; <img src='http://lifewithsoul.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Cheers,<br />
Fede</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
